Here is Sen Trillanes’ statement over Allan Peter Cayetano’s word war against former President Benigno Aquino III.
Secretary Allan Peter Cayetano of Foreign Affairs has proven to be a political snake. The Panatag standoff happened in 2012. during which time Cayetano was still a loyal ally of the Aquino administration, so obviously, he never saw anything wrong with how President Aquino resolved it then. As to my Senate exchange with Enrile, Cayetano even defended me that time since he was my minority leader back then. In fact, I clearly remember telling him, as well as the other senators then, of the gist of my mission as a backchannel negotiator. For that matter, I had multiple media interviews about it but, again, Cayetano never saw anything wrong with it then.
But for the benefit of those pretending to be blind and deaf, like Cayetano, for the 9th time, I will repeat the facts behind my role as backchannel negotiator.
I was officially designated as the backchannel negotiator by President Aquino in May 2012 at the height of the Panatag standoff, wherein about 80 to 100 Chinese vessels of various sizes were in and around the shoal. (Just to be clear, Panatag Shoal is in Zambales area and is not part of the Kalayaan Island Group in Palawan.) My mission, generally, was to deescalate the tension in the shoal. Specifically, it entailed the reduction of the number of Chinese ships in the area. The issue of sovereignty was not covered and was never discussed. The negotiations lasted for about 3 months, at the end of which we were able to reduce the number of Chinese ships in the area to just 3, all of which were positioned outside the shoal. In short, I was able to accomplish my mission.
The refusal of China to remove the remaining 3 ships forced the hand of President Aquino to file the arbitration case, which we eventually won.
Those are the facts and circumstances about this issue and I will not allow Cayetano to twist them. Now the question to Cayetano and his boss, Duterte, is this: “Why didn’t you follow through on our historic victory at the arbitration court?” or better yet: “Why aren’t you fighting for our sovereignty the way you promised during the campaign?”
Sen Trillanes has a valid point, right? What do you think?
You may want to read: